Choosing parents only works if their differences are heritable. Clones don't respond, and tight selection spends diversity.
Artificial selection is natural selection with a human choosing the parents. It can reshape a species fast, but only when the chosen differences are heritable, and it spends genetic diversity to do it.
Key terms
- Artificial selection — humans decide which individuals breed, based on traits they want. No genes are edited directly.
- Heritable variation — differences that come from alleles, so offspring inherit them. Selection can't work without it.
- Environmental variation — differences caused by light, food, water, or care. Offspring don't inherit them, so selecting on them does nothing.
- Genetic diversity — the variety of alleles in a population. Future responses, including resistance to a new disease, depend on it.
- Inbreeding — mating between close relatives. Offspring are homozygous more often, which exposes harmful recessive alleles.
- Carrier — a heterozygote with one copy of a recessive allele. It looks normal, so a breeder can't see the allele.
How it works
- Start with a population that varies in a trait: milk yield, flower size, beak shape.
- Each generation, the breeder lets only individuals with the wanted version of the trait reproduce.
- If the differences were heritable, offspring carry their parents' alleles, and the trait's average shifts toward what was chosen.
- Repeat for many generations. Favored alleles become common, and some become fixed: every individual carries only that allele.
- Few parents per generation → alleles are lost across the whole genome, not only at the genes for the chosen trait.
- That loss has costs. More harmful recessives end up homozygous, so survival and fertility can fall. One new disease can hit the whole line.
Why it matters
Darwin used breeders' results to argue that selection could reshape a lineage. Broccoli, cabbage, kale, and Brussels sprouts all came from one wild mustard species, each selected for a different part of the plant. On the exam, artificial selection runs on the same logic as natural selection: no heritable variation, no response. Expect data where the chosen trait climbs while diversity or survival falls.
Exam traps
| Trap | Actually |
|---|
| Keep breeding the biggest plants and the next generation will be bigger. | Only if the size differences are heritable. Among clones, differences come from light and water, so the average won't move. |
| Breeds that look very different must be different species. | Broccoli, cabbage, and kale are one species and still cross. A new species needs reproductive isolation, not a new look. |
| Culling every affected animal will wipe out a harmful recessive allele. | Once the allele is rare, most copies sit in healthy carriers. Culling removes it slower and slower. Carrier testing works better. |
| Inserting a gene or raising the mutation rate counts as artificial selection. | Artificial selection only chooses who breeds. Genetic engineering and mutagenesis change DNA directly; they're different tools. |
Worked example
Researchers start three lines of fruit flies from one lab population, all kept on the same food in the same room. Each generation, line Up breeds only the most active 10% of flies, line Down breeds only the least active 10%, and line Control breeds flies chosen at random. At generation 0, all three lines average 50 on an activity test. At generation 15, Up averages 78, Down 27, and Control 51. What do these results show, and why does the Control line matter?
- Control: same food, same room, random parents → almost no change (50 → 51). Lab conditions alone don't move activity.
- Up and Down moved in opposite directions, each toward the kind of parent that was chosen.
- Offspring resembled their chosen parents, so part of the variation in activity is heritable.
Activity level has a heritable component, and choosing parents shifted it in both directions. The Control line shows the change came from selection, not from the lab conditions.
Selection moves a trait's average only when parents pass on their differences. Two lines splitting apart under identical conditions is strong evidence they did. The near miss is 'the flies adapted to the lab.' If that were true, the Control line would have changed too, and it stayed near 50.